Compare
Original answers stay visible
Open Model answers to read each original response or compare two answers side by side.
01 · Ask
Agent is where every question starts: it researches, asks six models and writes one answer. Compare, the answers side by side, waits in the (+) menu, next to files and reasoning.
Preview of the message box, with this question typed in and ready to send:
Can a heat pump heat our 1978 house with the original radiators?
02 · Run
It asks six models in parallel, writes one answer from what they said, and has that answer checked against all six. Where they contradict each other on a fact, a separate judge reads the sources they cited. Scroll to move the run.
Preview of a finished Agent turn:
Can a heat pump heat our 1978 house with the original radiators?
Thought for 24s
Probably yes, with a few radiators changed, not all of them.
Three sentences from the answer and how the six models divided on each
A single answer would have handed you all three as settled.
43/100 agreement, 2 contradictions, 6 answers
03 · Decide
One answer, read top to bottom, with the disagreement written into it rather than hidden behind it. Four things carry that, and you can try each one here.
01
Every checked answer carries one number: how much the six answers actually agreed. A separate judge pass checks every sentence against all six, and the number is counted from those verdicts, not given as a grade.
02
The small number behind a sentence is how many models supported it. Rest on it, or tap it, and it names them: who agreed, who deviated, and in what words.
Try it on the 4/6.
Get a room-by-room heat-loss calculation before anyone quotes a heat pump size
Rooms that stay warm keep their radiators; only the rooms that fall short need larger or fan-assisted ones
03
Every checked sentence is highlighted in the colour of its result: green where every model agreed, amber where they split, red where they contradict each other. The mark sits on the sentence it belongs to, so you never have to hold two documents open at once.
04
Click a mark and the disagreement opens: both camps, named, with the sentence each side actually wrote and a note on what is worth checking yourself.
Try the marked sentence.
Three models would keep most radiators and run at 55 °C, three would replace more of them to run at 45 °C or below.
The models contradict each other here. Open details
replacing every radiator to get there costs more than that difference will save in a decade
The efficiency difference is around a quarter, and you pay it every winter for twenty years
The same lens on other questions
Proof, not promises
On 314 closed-book MMLU-Pro questions, the consensus ranks first overall, and pulls clear exactly where the models disagree.
When the models disagree
Accuracy on the questions where they split · MMLU-Pro
| System | Accuracy |
|---|---|
| consens.io consensus | 72.1% |
| Claude | 70.6% |
| GPT-5.5 | 69.1% |
| Gemini | 64.7% |
| Grok | 58.8% |
| DeepSeek | 44.1% |
| Mistral | 39.7% |
Live from real runs
Even ChatGPT, the model with the highest best-answer rate, gives the judge's pick in 56% of the runs it is in. In the other 44%, the best answer came from another model.
Open the model pulseShare of its runs in which a model's answer was the judge's pick · 516 judged runs · the tick marks a fair share by chance.
04 · Monitor
Turn any question into a Watch and say what you're waiting for. consens.io checks it on your schedule and tells you when the answer moves on new evidence, or when that thing happens.
Waiting for The AI Office can fine model providers Not yet
Why consens.io
Compare
Open Model answers to read each original response or compare two answers side by side.
Verify
Where the models pull apart, the sentence itself carries the mark, instead of the doubt being smoothed into one confident answer.
Control
Pick the agent's model, the six it checks with, and whether it reasons first. Model agreement is a comparison, not a fact-check of the whole answer.
Model coverage
Direct comparison across major model families, so every answer can be checked against independent alternatives.